Whether we realize it or not, we all have some kind of embedded worldview – a way of interpreting what happens around us everyday. For some of us this worldview stems from one or more religions, for others it comes from science, while others may derive their worldview from politics or even what they are told by anyone, there are any number of places we go to when subconsciously piecing together our worldviews.
Mine comes from religion – specifically Christianity. I grew up in a particular denomination that has its own way of interpreting life and the events that we see on the news every day. Just like so many other people, those outside of my denomination and even religion, I had no apparent reason to ask the small, yet increasingly large question, “Why?” I learned that my way of seeing things was right, so why would I ask otherwise? If my way of interpreting the world at large was incorrect, why would I believe it in the first place? That even sounds like a good argument at first glace.
It just occurred to me that maybe it isn’t the best idea to cultivate only my way of thinking about things, whether it be current events, TV shows or movies, or even the Bible. I set out with some resolve to learn more about what I believe and to ask the dreaded question, “Why?” a whole lot more. It tends to be difficult to dig into something that you already disagree with, but at the same time, it is only fair. As a general example, I’ve been reading some practical theology about how God works in the world – the purpose of which is to is to hopefully learn how to better interact with him. Joyfully I began to read a book by a theologian that I agree with on nearly everything but to be fair, I decided it would only be right to give a different theologian a shot. It was painful at times. I really didn’t like doing it. But it did help.
I ended up in the book of Job. As the traditional “God does whatever he wants, even to the best of the best, and all we can do about it is rest in God’s grace for still being alive” book of the Bible (that sounds a little harsh – sorry) it carries some heavy connotations, as my subtitle for it might betray. Typically when I think of Job, I think of injustice being renamed justice, I think of difficulty and I think of paradox. Today, reading a chapter from that favorable theologian’s book, he suggested that we read Job in a different light. Throughout Job we find him, stricken with undeserved greif, wondering aloud how God could be “attacking” him, “assailing” him, “choking” him. He calls God his “opponent” and accuses God of treating him “without pity” rushing at him “like a warrior.” What is that about? How can I read this book and not get a picture of God that is just downright wrong? Is this really what God is like?
Absolutely not.
We know that: a) God is not doing this evil to him, that it is the satan that is doing it, and b) Job is in such anguish, he is falling back on his theology (a bad, faulty theology) to explain his predicament. I have never heard of this line of thought before. It would be easy to take anything negative Job says about God or the way he works in the world out of context and use it as a weapon in some other theological battle, but it would be inappropriate. There is however a happy ending to the story – or at least a good point to the story: God confronts him for spending chapter after chapter badmouthing him and sets him straight – then comes the good part. Job says:
“Surely I spoke of theings I did not understand,
things too wonderful for me to know . . .
Therefore I despise myself and repent in the dust and ashes.” (42:3, 6 NIV)
Job realized with the help of God that he has not understood the situation – his worldview was based on bad theology and he was caught in the downward spiral of utter depression and anger. For me, it was hard to read those passages and say, nope, that’s not the right way to talk about God. My upbringing told me to take it as the book says it and don’t question it. But by questioning it and being willing to look at these passages differently, I’ve been able to re-frame the way I look at the world theologically.
While it may be difficult at times to change the way you look at something, or intentionally step out of your comfort zone and reinterpret something, it can do a world of good in the long run. It may even change the way you look at things on the grander scale. Even if it doesn’t it pays to have a fuller grasp on the spectrum of viewpoints.